jokosun.solutions

Blog

  • MacRumors Forums: Discussing HiDPI for External Screens in MBA M4

    Hello everyone! I recently purchased the MBA M4 and set it up with two 27-inch 1440p monitors at work. As I’ve been exploring features like MST and HIDPI, I’ve encountered a few challenges.

    My primary monitor connects through a DELL DOCK using a DisplayPort cable. In the display settings, I can select a resolution of 2560×1440, but it appears without HIDPI, making it look quite poor. The default HIDPI option only works for lower resolutions, which makes everything oversized and impractical.

    I discovered that by using one-key-hidpi, I could achieve a 2048×1152 resolution with HIDPI enabled. This setting gives me sharp text that’s just the right size. I’m curious if this is the maximum resolution I can reach under my current setup with HIDPI activated.

    Additionally, is the one-key-hidpi the optimal method for enabling it? At home, I have an LG 34 21:9 monitor with a resolution of 3440×1440, but I haven’t connected it yet since I lack a USB-C cable and a hub. I wonder what resolution I can expect with HIDPI enabled for my LG monitor.

    Can anyone recommend suitable cables or hubs for this connection? I assume an HDMI to USB-C cable would allow me to connect my LG at home, and I would need a hub to connect my second monitor at work. Thank you for any advice you can provide!

  • Declining Speaker Quality in MacBook Pro Devices

    I’ve had consistent issues with the speakers in my MacBook Pro (MBP) models. Starting with my 13-inch 2009 model, the speakers were already malfunctioning when I acquired it.

    My first 2012 13-inch MBP failed just six months before I had to replace it, and its successor followed suit a week later. While my 2012 15-inch Retina MBP initially showed no problems, after a month, one of its speakers also failed.

    Now, my 2014 15-inch Retina MBP has experienced a similar fate with its left speaker. The common factor in all of these failures seems to be the foam that attaches the central membrane to the speaker chassis.

    This is puzzling because none of my other laptops from brands like HP, Dell, Lenovo, or Asus have ever had similar speaker issues. Upon inspecting those devices, I found that they do not incorporate foam in their speakers.

    It raises the question: why did Apple choose to use foam in high-end products? It seems to deteriorate over time, often just after the warranty period runs out, with no clear advantage for its use.

    Is there a viable solution for this problem? Replacement parts are likely to be just as old and prone to the same failure.

    Ideally, I would want to replace merely the faulty speaker with a compatible model that doesn’t rely on foam. Finding a long-lasting solution would be essential, especially since the current trend indicates that these parts will only continue to age and deteriorate further.

    It’s frustrating to deal with such recurring issues in premium devices.

  • Discussing the Same Topic Repeatedly: MacRumors Forums

    The debate surrounding design choices, particularly the use of notches in devices, has been ongoing for some time. Until it personally affected me, I remained largely indifferent. Recently, I upgraded to a MacBook Pro M4 Pro Max for work, transitioning from an i9 Intel model. While I truly appreciate the capabilities of this new machine, I find the notch at the top of the screen rather frustrating.

    The concept of adding a small bezel above the screen to accommodate the camera seems logical. Instead of having a notch that interrupts the display, a slightly larger bezel could house the camera and other necessary components. This design would allow for a seamless all-screen look, enhancing the overall aesthetic of the laptop. Interestingly, I’ve noticed that I don’t find the notch on my phone as bothersome.

    It seems less prominent and doesn’t interfere as much with my user experience. However, on my new MacBook Pro, the notch feels like wasted space, almost like having an intrusive feature staring back at me—the “eye of Sauron,” if you will. Despite my admiration for the capabilities and performance of the MacBook Pro, I struggle to comprehend the design logic behind this choice. It seems counterproductive to sacrifice visual coherence for a design trend that doesn’t enhance usability.

    In summary, while I embrace the power of my new device, the notch remains an unwelcome feature in an otherwise impressive machine.

  • Has anyone upgraded their MacBook Air from High Sierra to Monterey

    I am currently using macOS 10.13.3 (High Sierra) on my 2017 MacBook Air, which has an Intel i5 processor, 8GB of RAM, and a 120GB SSD. I am considering an upgrade to Monterey (12.7.4) and am weighing my options. There are two upgrade paths to think about:

    1. The step-by-step upgrade process which involves moving from 10.13 (High Sierra) to 10.14 (Mojave), then to 10.15 (Catalina), followed by 11 (Big Sur), and finally reaching 12 (Monterey).

    2. A direct upgrade from 10.13 (High Sierra) to 12.7.4 (Monterey). However, I have some concerns about the upgrade process. One major issue is the potential for problems related to the APFS conversion.

    Additionally, I am wondering if any of my 32-bit applications will become incompatible after the upgrade. I am also contemplating whether to opt for a clean install or an upgrade-in-place, keeping in mind the implications for performance and stability, especially on older MacBook Air hardware. I have taken precautions by making multiple backups, including using Time Machine, creating a bootable USB installer for Monterey, and having external SSD backups. My primary goal is to avoid any risks of rendering my Mac unusable or encountering unexpected firmware issues during the upgrade.

    I would appreciate any insights from others who have made this leap or have taken partial steps recently. If anyone has encountered challenges or has helpful tips regarding this upgrade process, I would be grateful for your input.

  • M5 iPad Pro Set for Mass Production Launch in Late 2025, According to MacRumors

    The next-generation iPad Pro, featuring Apple’s M5 processor, is set to begin mass production in the latter half of 2025, as reported by industry analyst Ming-Chi Kuo. The production will mainly be handled by BYD Electronics, which is also designated as the sole assembler for Apple’s upcoming display-equipped HomePod, scheduled for release in late 2025.

    This announcement follows the launch of the previous iPad Pro variant with an OLED display, which debuted in May 2024, showcasing Apple’s M4 chip. Apple has reportedly placed orders for M5 chips from TSMC, indicating that the development of the next-generation processor is underway.

    The M5 series is anticipated to incorporate advanced ARM architecture and will utilize TSMC’s cutting-edge 3-nanometer process technology. Notably, Apple chose not to use TSMC’s newer 2-nanometer process for the M5, a decision likely influenced by budget considerations.

    Nonetheless, the M5 chip is expected to offer considerable improvements over the M4, particularly by integrating TSMC’s System on Integrated Chip (SoIC) technology. At this time, there are no additional rumors regarding new features for the M5 iPad Pro.

    However, Apple’s potential plans to switch the rear Apple logo orientation to a landscape position on future iPads have sparked interest among enthusiasts. In related news, the upcoming iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 17 Pro Max are generating buzz, with numerous credible sources hinting at various changes.

    As Apple continues to refine its product lineup, anticipation builds for innovations in both its iPad and iPhone offerings in the coming years.

  • IO V IYO DEFENSE

    Welcome to the IO V IYO Defense documents section. Here, users can find a comprehensive array of resources aimed at supporting their needs.

    To get started, users need to sign in. This grants access to various documents and features designed for enhanced user experience.

    The interface supports multiple languages, including US English, German, Spanish, French, Italian, Russian, and others, making it accessible to a wide audience. For those unfamiliar with the features available, a guided tour is offered.

    This tour provides an overview of how to navigate the documentation effectively and understand the different functionalities. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) are also available to address common inquiries and concerns, ensuring that users can find information quickly and easily.

    Users can search for specific documentation related to APIs and add-ons. The API documentation is particularly useful for developers looking to integrate their applications with the platform seamlessly.

    For those interested in expanded features, DocumentCloud Premium offers additional tools and functionalities. If you find value in the resources provided, consider donating to support DocumentCloud.

    Your contributions help maintain and improve the available resources. Additionally, users can reach out with any questions or concerns via email for further assistance.

    Lastly, the Legacy DocumentCloud section is available for those who may need to access older documentation or features. Overall, this platform is designed to meet diverse needs and provide a streamlined user experience.

  • Link Not Working

    It seems that the link you attempted to access is not valid. This may be due to an incorrect URL or a typographical error. If you are the publisher of the content, it’s possible that the failure is related to misspellings in the parameters or the addition of extra characters at the end of the link.

    Please double-check the URL for any mistakes. If the link appears accurate but still isn’t functioning, consider clearing your browser’s cache or trying a different browser or device. Make one final attempt to test the link.

    If it still does not work, don’t hesitate to reach out for assistance. You can contact us via email for support regarding the broken link.

  • Invalid Link Detected

    It seems that the link you tried to access is invalid. The URL may be incorrect or may contain some typographical errors. If you are the publisher of the link, it’s possible that it failed due to a misspelled parameter name or because extra characters were added at the end. Double-check the entire link to ensure everything is accurate.

    Should you find that the link appears to be correct but still won’t work, consider clearing your browser’s cache or attempting to open the link in a different browser or device. Sometimes, minor issues can be resolved by taking these simple steps. If you have tested the link multiple times without any success, please reach out to our support team for further assistance. You can contact us directly via email at [email protected] with the subject line “Bad Link.”

    We are here to help you resolve any issues you’re experiencing. Thank you for your patience, and we appreciate your understanding in this matter.

  • Invalid URL/Error: Link Not Found or Access Denied

    It seems that the link you tried to access is not valid. The URL may have been incorrectly entered or contains a typographical error. If you are the publisher of the link, check for any spelling mistakes in the parameters or any unnecessary characters added at the end of the URL. Ensure that everything appears to be in order; if it does but the link still isn’t functioning, you might want to clear your web browser’s cache.

    Alternatively, try accessing the link using a different browser or device to see if that resolves the issue. If you have gone through these steps and the link still does not work, you can reach out for assistance. Consider contacting support directly for further help.

  • Invalid Link: Access Restricted or No Longer Available

    It seems that the link you have clicked on is not a valid geni.us link. This could be due to an error in the URL, such as a misspelling or unintended characters appended to the end.

    If you are the publisher, ensure that the link is entered correctly. It’s common for URLs to fail because of these minor errors.

    Double-check the spelling of each component in the link to confirm accuracy. If everything appears correct but the link still isn’t working, there are a few steps you can take.

    First, try clearing your browser’s cache. Sometimes, outdated cookies and files can affect link functionality.

    You might also consider using a different browser or device to see if that resolves the issue. Give the link another try after performing these actions.

    If it still doesn’t work, we recommend reaching out for assistance. You can contact our support team via email at [email protected] with a subject line indicating the issue, such as “Bad Link”.

    They will be able to help you further. Thank you for your understanding, and we apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.