Category: News

In my experience with the unusual external display setup using the M4 chip, there are several drawbacks compared to the M1 Pro, despite some advantages. The 32:9 ultrawide display (G95SC) is correctly recognized, and it can support VRR at 240Hz, a feat not possible with the M1 Pro, which maxed out at 120Hz. However, this setup introduces new complications.

One major issue is the slow and occasionally failed wakeup function. Each time I toggle HDR or VRR, the display disconnects and disappears from the settings menu, forcing the MacBook Air to struggle before reconnecting. This issue is problematic for clamshell mode; since I am using a Thunderbolt dock with DisplayPort, the monitor sometimes takes an excessively long time to wake.

In some instances, it fails to wake up altogether and reverts to sleep mode. This issue did not occur with other monitors, leading me to question whether it’s a problem with the G95SC or macOS. The M1 Pro had no such issues running in 120Hz mode.

Additionally, when attempting to use dual monitors, the Thunderbolt dock could drive two displays (5120×1440@120Hz and 3840×2160@144Hz) simultaneously with the M1 Pro. However, the M4 struggles when connected to the 32:9 monitor at 240Hz and fails to support another display, even if I reduce the refresh rate to 120Hz or connect a second monitor to a different Thunderbolt port. It’s worth noting that the setup still works fine with two standard 16:9 144Hz monitors.

As for alternatives, the DP1.4 to HDMI2.1 adapter, which didn’t work with my M1 Pro setup, performs almost flawlessly with the M4 at 5120×1440@240Hz without any lag. Unfortunately, the colors appear oversaturated, regardless of the color profile used.

Hello everyone! I recently purchased the MBA M4 and set it up with two 27-inch 1440p monitors at work. As I’ve been exploring features like MST and HIDPI, I’ve encountered a few challenges.

My primary monitor connects through a DELL DOCK using a DisplayPort cable. In the display settings, I can select a resolution of 2560×1440, but it appears without HIDPI, making it look quite poor. The default HIDPI option only works for lower resolutions, which makes everything oversized and impractical.

I discovered that by using one-key-hidpi, I could achieve a 2048×1152 resolution with HIDPI enabled. This setting gives me sharp text that’s just the right size. I’m curious if this is the maximum resolution I can reach under my current setup with HIDPI activated.

Additionally, is the one-key-hidpi the optimal method for enabling it? At home, I have an LG 34 21:9 monitor with a resolution of 3440×1440, but I haven’t connected it yet since I lack a USB-C cable and a hub. I wonder what resolution I can expect with HIDPI enabled for my LG monitor.

Can anyone recommend suitable cables or hubs for this connection? I assume an HDMI to USB-C cable would allow me to connect my LG at home, and I would need a hub to connect my second monitor at work. Thank you for any advice you can provide!

The debate surrounding design choices, particularly the use of notches in devices, has been ongoing for some time. Until it personally affected me, I remained largely indifferent. Recently, I upgraded to a MacBook Pro M4 Pro Max for work, transitioning from an i9 Intel model. While I truly appreciate the capabilities of this new machine, I find the notch at the top of the screen rather frustrating.

The concept of adding a small bezel above the screen to accommodate the camera seems logical. Instead of having a notch that interrupts the display, a slightly larger bezel could house the camera and other necessary components. This design would allow for a seamless all-screen look, enhancing the overall aesthetic of the laptop. Interestingly, I’ve noticed that I don’t find the notch on my phone as bothersome.

It seems less prominent and doesn’t interfere as much with my user experience. However, on my new MacBook Pro, the notch feels like wasted space, almost like having an intrusive feature staring back at me—the “eye of Sauron,” if you will. Despite my admiration for the capabilities and performance of the MacBook Pro, I struggle to comprehend the design logic behind this choice. It seems counterproductive to sacrifice visual coherence for a design trend that doesn’t enhance usability.

In summary, while I embrace the power of my new device, the notch remains an unwelcome feature in an otherwise impressive machine.

Welcome to the IO V IYO Defense documents section. Here, users can find a comprehensive array of resources aimed at supporting their needs.

To get started, users need to sign in. This grants access to various documents and features designed for enhanced user experience.

The interface supports multiple languages, including US English, German, Spanish, French, Italian, Russian, and others, making it accessible to a wide audience. For those unfamiliar with the features available, a guided tour is offered.

This tour provides an overview of how to navigate the documentation effectively and understand the different functionalities. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) are also available to address common inquiries and concerns, ensuring that users can find information quickly and easily.

Users can search for specific documentation related to APIs and add-ons. The API documentation is particularly useful for developers looking to integrate their applications with the platform seamlessly.

For those interested in expanded features, DocumentCloud Premium offers additional tools and functionalities. If you find value in the resources provided, consider donating to support DocumentCloud.

Your contributions help maintain and improve the available resources. Additionally, users can reach out with any questions or concerns via email for further assistance.

Lastly, the Legacy DocumentCloud section is available for those who may need to access older documentation or features. Overall, this platform is designed to meet diverse needs and provide a streamlined user experience.

It seems that the link you attempted to access is not valid. This may be due to an incorrect URL or a typographical error. If you are the publisher of the content, it’s possible that the failure is related to misspellings in the parameters or the addition of extra characters at the end of the link.

Please double-check the URL for any mistakes. If the link appears accurate but still isn’t functioning, consider clearing your browser’s cache or trying a different browser or device. Make one final attempt to test the link.

If it still does not work, don’t hesitate to reach out for assistance. You can contact us via email for support regarding the broken link.

It seems that the link you tried to access is invalid. The URL may be incorrect or may contain some typographical errors. If you are the publisher of the link, it’s possible that it failed due to a misspelled parameter name or because extra characters were added at the end. Double-check the entire link to ensure everything is accurate.

Should you find that the link appears to be correct but still won’t work, consider clearing your browser’s cache or attempting to open the link in a different browser or device. Sometimes, minor issues can be resolved by taking these simple steps. If you have tested the link multiple times without any success, please reach out to our support team for further assistance. You can contact us directly via email at [email protected] with the subject line “Bad Link.”

We are here to help you resolve any issues you’re experiencing. Thank you for your patience, and we appreciate your understanding in this matter.

It seems that the link you tried to access is not valid. The URL may have been incorrectly entered or contains a typographical error. If you are the publisher of the link, check for any spelling mistakes in the parameters or any unnecessary characters added at the end of the URL. Ensure that everything appears to be in order; if it does but the link still isn’t functioning, you might want to clear your web browser’s cache.

Alternatively, try accessing the link using a different browser or device to see if that resolves the issue. If you have gone through these steps and the link still does not work, you can reach out for assistance. Consider contacting support directly for further help.

It seems that the link you have clicked on is not a valid geni.us link. This could be due to an error in the URL, such as a misspelling or unintended characters appended to the end.

If you are the publisher, ensure that the link is entered correctly. It’s common for URLs to fail because of these minor errors.

Double-check the spelling of each component in the link to confirm accuracy. If everything appears correct but the link still isn’t working, there are a few steps you can take.

First, try clearing your browser’s cache. Sometimes, outdated cookies and files can affect link functionality.

You might also consider using a different browser or device to see if that resolves the issue. Give the link another try after performing these actions.

If it still doesn’t work, we recommend reaching out for assistance. You can contact our support team via email at [email protected] with a subject line indicating the issue, such as “Bad Link”.

They will be able to help you further. Thank you for your understanding, and we apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.

We apologize, but the link you tried to access is not valid. It seems that the URL may be incorrect or contains a typo. If you are the publisher of the link, please note that many links fail due to minor errors, such as misspellings in the parameters or additional characters at the end of the URL.

Please double-check the link for any mistakes. If you are confident that the link is correct but it still isn’t working, consider clearing your browser’s cache or trying to access the link using a different browser or device. This may resolve any issues that are occurring.

After trying these solutions, test the link once more. If you still encounter problems, please don’t hesitate to reach out for assistance. You can contact us directly via email at [email protected] with the subject line “Bad Link.”

Thank you for your understanding, and we appreciate your patience as we work to resolve the issue.

It appears that the link you followed is not valid or may contain errors. If you are the publisher of the link, you should examine the URL closely. Many links fail due to common mistakes such as misspelled parameter names or accidentally added characters at the end of the URL.

Take a moment to check everything for correctness. If the link appears to be accurate but still does not work, consider clearing your browser’s cache or trying a different browser or device. Sometimes technical glitches can interfere with link functionality.

Testing the link again after making these adjustments could help. If none of these solutions resolve the issue, please reach out to us for further assistance. You can contact us via email at [email protected] with the subject line “Bad Link.”

We are here to help you troubleshoot the problem.