jokosun.solutions

Author: admin

  • Discussing Nvidia’s Ada and Blackwell GPUs in the 2019 Mac Pro on MacRumors Forums

    Is it possible to install the new 3000 series NVIDIA GPUs into our Mac Pro (2019) and use them effectively under Bootcamp/Windows? While the Windows experience may be excellent, macOS compatibility is highly unlikely. My own experience with the RTX 2080 Ti has been seamless in Bootcamp, and I hope for the same with the 3000 series cards.

    However, I am currently facing challenges with dual HBR3 setups using an unflashed GC-Titan Ridge, especially in conjunction with DisplayPort 1.4 monitors. I wonder if using the Pro Display XDR alongside one of these GPUs would be feasible given the absence of Thunderbolt on the card. It seems plausible to connect it through two DisplayPort outputs into the Gigabyte Titan Ridge card, then a single Thunderbolt 3 connection to the Pro Display.

    Unfortunately, the GPU isn’t recognized in macOS, resulting in kernel panics if the Mac goes to sleep. A kernel panic is a serious operating system error causing crashes, akin to the Blue Screen of Death in Windows. It’s worth noting that, at this time, we await Apple’s potential support for new AMD GPUs, though this may be a long wait.

    There’s buzz about AMD’s upcoming “Big Navi” competitor, but I’m skeptical it will outperform or match the RTX 3090. If AMD offers a solid alternative that is compatible with both macOS and Windows, it may become a more sensible choice moving forward. Regarding physical installation, full-length PCI cards are indeed supported in the Mac Pro 7,1 with a standard length of 312mm.

    The RTX 3090 measures 313mm, which suggests that minor adjustments might make it feasible. Power delivery is another consideration; the dual 8-pin connectors supply up to 300W, along with 75W from the PCI slot, totaling 375W. Given that dual Vega II Duo models consume around 500W each and occupy eight slots, in theory, we could potentially install one or more RTX 3090 cards.

  • Using a Late 2015 iMac 5K as External Display with Speakers and Camera

    I am planning to convert an iMac 5K from late 2015 into an external monitor for my MacBook Pro M1 Max and MacBook Pro M2 Max. My main goal is to utilize the impressive screen resolution of 5120 x 2880, along with retaining the functionalities of the camera and speakers from the original iMac. To achieve this, I have conducted some research and found a board available on AliExpress that may suit my needs. However, I am unsure about its compatibility with my project requirements.

    It’s crucial for me to ensure that any components I purchase will work seamlessly together and allow me to benefit from the iMac’s high resolution and built-in audio and video features. I would appreciate your guidance on the best approach to take for this conversion. Specifically, I am looking for recommendations on any additional hardware, adapters, or boards that I might need, as well as steps I should follow to ensure a successful setup. If you have experience with similar projects or insights into the compatibility of various components, your advice would be invaluable.

    I want to make sure that I can maximize the potential of both my iMac and my MacBook Pro systems. Thank you for your assistance!

  • Is It Normal for AppleCare+ Renewal Dates to Change?

    I recently purchased a “Like New” M4 MacBook Air from Amazon UK, which was part of Amazon’s official resale program. When I made the purchase, there were still about 10 days left for me to buy AppleCare. While I couldn’t do it directly from the settings as I usually do, I managed to secure it through the Apple website after signing in to check my coverage. I completed the AppleCare purchase without any issues, receiving an email confirmation of my coverage right after.

    I bought the laptop in mid-July, and it was clear that the MacBook had been initially purchased in late May. The renewal date displayed for my AppleCare was May 26th, 2026, given that I opted for the annual plan. This all seemed logical to me, and I was satisfied with it. However, yesterday, I noticed a change in the renewal date when I was looking for something else.

    The renewal date shifted to July 18th, which was the day after I purchased AppleCare on July 17th. This caught me off guard, as I expected the renewal date to align with the original purchase date of the MacBook. Is this change in the renewal date typical? I assumed it would extend for one year from the original purchase date.

    I’m hoping I am still covered under the AppleCare plan and that there’s nothing further I need to address.

  • 14-Inch vs. 16-Inch: Which MacBook Model is More Ideal for Your Needs?

    Could you share more information about your intended use for the computer? This would help in providing tailored advice. If you’re considering the latest M4 chips and don’t need a machine right away, it might be wise to wait until next week.

    More details on the thermal properties of the Pro and Max chips will be revealed then. The new Pro chip features additional performance cores compared to last year, and it seems the M4 line offers greater efficiency than the M3. Gathering insights from reviews and hands-on experiences will be beneficial.

    In general, when selecting a computer, prioritizing the size that suits your needs is more important than choosing a less optimal model just to reduce throttling slightly. Histories from the past three chip generations indicate that the Pro chip operates effectively within a 14-inch chassis. In contrast, the M3 Max found in my 16-inch model can become quite warm under sustained workloads, causing light throttling even with the larger cooling system.

    It’s reasonable to assume that the 14-inch model may experience more frequent throttling. However, unless you are monitoring sensor charts closely, you might not easily perceive this throttling in day-to-day performance. For most practical purposes, unless you’re engaged in time-sensitive tasks where every second counts, the minor drop in performance during prolonged activities may go unnoticed in the real world.

    Therefore, focus on selecting a size that aligns with your specific needs over potential thermal considerations.

  • Rumored Features of the Upcoming ‘iPhone 17 Air’: 48MP Camera, 8GB RAM, and More – MacRumors

    Recent reports suggest that Apple is gearing up to launch a redesigned, significantly thinner iPhone 17 model next year, often referred to as the “iPhone 17 Air” until its official name is confirmed. This new device is expected to feature a range of advanced specifications, although some details remain unclear.

    Most sources indicate that the iPhone 17 Air will boast a display of approximately 6.6 inches. Analyst Ming-Chi Kuo highlighted expectations for a standard A19 chip, Dynamic Island, and a single rear camera.

    Recently, Jeff Pu from Haitong International echoed these sentiments, affirming that the phone will be made using TSMC’s 3nm process for the A19 chip and will include an aluminum frame, Face ID, an impressive 48-megapixel rear camera, and an enhanced 24-megapixel front camera. Additionally, the device is anticipated to feature 8GB of RAM aimed at boosting its artificial intelligence capabilities.

    Pu also emphasized that the iPhone 17 Air will present a noticeable design upgrade from earlier models, indicating that it will replace the Plus model in Apple’s lineup, further hinting that there won’t be an iPhone 17 Plus version. The anticipated release date for the iPhone 17 Air is September 2025, giving ample time for further details to surface or change.

    It is worth noting that Pu has a history of providing reliable information regarding Apple’s future product launches. In the broader context of the upcoming iPhone series, the iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max models are also generating buzz, with their own set of rumored features.

    As excitement builds for Apple’s September announcement event, consumers are eagerly waiting for confirmation of these various specifications and designs.

  • Topshop’s Replacement Officially Announced as New Major Store Set to Open Soon in Solihull

    The long-awaited replacement for the former Topshop store in Solihull’s Touchwood Shopping Centre has finally been confirmed, with plans for a new giant store to open within days. This prominent unit, located in the Crescent Arcade of the mall, has remained vacant since Topshop announced its closure in 2021. The decision came after the pandemic led to widespread store shutdowns and the eventual collapse of Topshop’s parent company, Arcadia Group. Interest around the site intensified in January 2024 when the shopping center installed a mystery hoarding featuring various fictional storefronts.

    Touchwood management kept details under wraps, with general manager Tony Elvin hinting at an exciting new opening set for the coming year. Recent developments have revealed that Apple will be taking over the space, marked by new signs posted on July 18. The tech giant currently operates a smaller location directly across the arcade, but it is reported that this existing store, open since 2007, will close once the new location opens at the end of this month. The new Apple store is anticipated to be significantly larger, enhancing the shopping experience for customers.

    The official opening date for the new store is Saturday, July 26. While both Apple and Touchwood have been approached for additional comment, Apple has confirmed the date but has not disclosed further details about the new establishment. This comes amidst other recent changes in Touchwood, including the launch of a Mediterranean restaurant, Ori Caffe, within John Lewis, and the arrival of the jewellery store Austen and Blake, which took over the former Costa Coffee unit last November.

  • Invalid Link

    It seems that the link you tried to access is not a valid geni.us link. The URL you followed may be incorrect or contain typographical errors. If you are the publisher of the link, it’s common for links to fail due to small mistakes such as misspelled parameter names or additional characters at the end of the URL. Take a moment to double-check the link for any inaccuracies.

    If everything appears to be correct but the link is still not functioning, consider clearing your browser’s cache or trying a different browser or device. Sometimes these steps can resolve the issue. Before giving up, you might want to test the link one last time. However, if it continues to be problematic, we encourage you to get in touch with us for assistance.

    You can reach out through our support email for further help. We appreciate your patience as we work to resolve this issue.

  • Invalid Link

    It seems that the link you are trying to access is not valid. The URL may be either incorrect or contain a typo. If you are the publisher of the link, please double-check it.

    Often, issues arise from misspellings in the parameter names or from unintended extra characters at the end of the URL. If the link appears to be accurate but is still not functioning, consider clearing your browser’s cache or trying a different browser or device. You may want to test the link once more.

    If you continue to experience problems, please feel free to reach out for further assistance. You can contact our support team by sending an email with details about the bad link.

  • Invalid or Broken Link

    It seems that the link you entered is not valid. The URL you followed may contain errors, such as a misspelling or unwanted characters at the end. If you are the publisher of the link, it’s important to double-check for any mistakes in the parameters.

    Many links break due to such errors. If the link appears correct but still doesn’t work, consider clearing your browser cache or trying a different browser or device. Once you’ve made these adjustments, try testing the link again.

    If the issue persists, please reach out to our support team for assistance. You can contact us via email at [email protected] and include “Bad Link” in the subject line for quicker support. We’re here to help!

  • Link Not Found

    It seems that the link you tried to access is not valid. The URL may be incorrect or has been mistyped.

    If you are the publisher of the content, it’s common for links to fail due to a simple misspelling in a parameter name or the presence of extra characters at the end of the URL. Double-checking these details might resolve the issue.

    If your link appears to be correct, and yet it still doesn’t work, consider clearing your browser cache or trying to access the link using a different browser or device. This might help to reset any potential blocks or errors affecting access.

    After verifying everything and if the link continues to be unresponsive, please do not hesitate to reach out to us for assistance. You can contact our support team for help with the situation.