I am looking for some clarification regarding the moderation of frivolous posts. I reviewed the rules for what constitutes such posts, and I feel there’s a discrepancy that needs addressing.
Recently, I reported a post that simply stated, “Great news.” This post contained no additional context or commentary.
According to the frivolous post rules, any one- or two-word contributions like “cool,” “LOL,” or “I agree,” are considered non-constructive. The rules clearly state that if a post does not contribute meaningfully to the discussion, it should not be made.
Given that my reported post fell into the same category as those examples, I am puzzled by the response I received. The moderator team stated they had reviewed the post and determined no action was necessary, which contradicts what the rules imply regarding similar posts.
I am not trying to argue against the moderation team’s decisions, as I have been moderated in the past for making “no substance” replies myself. I acknowledge my own mistakes and understand the importance of maintaining quality in discussions.
However, this situation raises a question: If posts like “Great news” don’t warrant moderation, then what qualifies as a frivolous post? How do we ensure consistency in moderation efforts?
In wanting to understand this better, I waive my right to privacy in discussing this specific moderation topic. I believe it is essential for the community to uphold the standards that keep our discussions meaningful.
Thank you for considering my concerns.
Leave a Reply