Category: News

I’m genuinely curious about the process of switching from the Developer Beta to the Public Beta once it becomes available. My initial thought is that it may not be possible because the Public Beta likely operates on a lower build compared to the Developer Beta. To ensure a smooth transition, I believe I would need to restore my device back to the latest stable version, such as iOS 17.5.1, or whatever is current at that time.

After restoring and setting everything back up, my next step would be to navigate to the settings and opt into the Public Beta. This seems to be the most logical approach, but I wanted to confirm my assumptions. Switching beta channels can sometimes lead to complications, and I want to make sure I am taking the right steps.

If anyone has experience with this process or knows if my assumptions are accurate, I would really appreciate any insights. It’s important for me to understand the best way to transition between these beta options without running into issues. Thanks in advance for any advice or clarification on this matter.

I have been putting off updating my iOS due to previous issues with broken updates, but I finally took the plunge and upgraded to iOS 18.5. Unfortunately, now my Mail app isn’t showing notifications. To troubleshoot, I attempted several solutions.

First, I disabled and then re-enabled the notification settings for the Mail app, hoping that would resolve the issue. I also restarted my phone, thinking that a simple reboot might fix any glitches. Additionally, I checked for further software updates, just in case there were any fixes released for this specific problem.

I made sure to open and close the Mail app multiple times to see if it would refresh and start displaying notifications. Lastly, I reviewed my Focus settings, ensuring that they weren’t interfering with the app’s notifications. Despite all these efforts, the notifications still don’t appear.

I’m reaching out to see if anyone else has encountered this issue or has found a solution. It’s frustrating to deal with a problem like this after finally updating to what I hoped would be a more stable version of iOS. If anyone has any tips or advice, it would be greatly appreciated.

I’m thrilled to announce my indie Mac app, Photos Backup Anywhere. This application serves as a simple, one-click solution for backing up your photos, drawing inspiration from Time Machine.

Photos Backup Anywhere is designed to work seamlessly with iCloud, even accommodating the “Optimize Storage” setting. This ensures that your entire photo library is safely backed up, offering peace of mind.

It’s important to keep in mind that backup is not the same as synchronization; iCloud sync does not protect against data loss. The app enables you to back up your content to any volume connected to your Mac, including NAS network drives and external storage devices.

If you have any questions about the app’s functionality or features, please don’t hesitate to reach out. I’m here to help and eager to hear your feedback.

Additionally, I would like to highlight that we have a frequently asked questions section available for those who may want to learn more about the app and how it works. Lastly, there is a free TestFlight beta version available for you to try out the app before its official release.

I’m looking forward to your thoughts and experiences with Photos Backup Anywhere!

Carbon Copy Cloner (CCC) is not suitable for backing up data directly from Apple Cloud or any other cloud storage service. It typically struggles with network-type drives, as it treats them in a way that may not offer reliable performance. If you’re looking to back up your data, it’s important to clarify that CCC is not designed to create backups of cloud data itself.

Using CCC for local backups is the more effective strategy. You can create images on external drives or a Network-Attached Storage (NAS) system. Local storage options, such as those connected via Thunderbolt, USB 3.1, or gigabit Ethernet, provide significantly better speed and lower latency compared to internet-based solutions.

In some cases, it might be quicker to reinstall an operating system than to recover it via a cloud backup. For data files, a dual approach can be beneficial: maintain local backups while also syncing crucial files to an offsite service like Dropbox. This allows for selective restoration, ensuring that you can retrieve only the necessary files in the event of a data loss, rather than struggling with slow internet speeds for larger restores.

Currently, I’m evaluating Acronis and Arqbackup, leaning towards Arqbackup for its capabilities. While Acronis has been a solid solution for Windows systems, macOS offers reliable alternatives like CCC and SuperDuper for backup needs. However, be aware that the time taken to upload or recover large amounts of data to the cloud can be considerable.

In summary, CCC can back up files to iCloud, but it may not handle system backups effectively if you are using the optimization features of iCloud Drive. Testing backups with various configurations is essential, particularly when dealing with larger data sets.

I used to have AirDrop easily accessible in the Finder sidebar, but now I can’t seem to add it back. It’s frustrating because I’m not sure where it has gone or how to retrieve this option. When I use Spotlight to search for AirDrop, I can see that it is still an app, but I am unable to locate it among my applications. This inconsistency is confusing, as I would like to have AirDrop readily available for my file-sharing needs.

If anyone else has faced a similar issue or knows how to get AirDrop back in the Finder sidebar, your advice would be greatly appreciated. It’s essential for me to streamline my workflow, and having quick access to AirDrop is a significant part of that.

Hello Mac community. I hope you can help me with a problem I’m experiencing. Please bear with me as I navigate the forum. I acquired several Macs as a joke, all models from 2009 to 2011.

Recently, I started working with a 2011 21.5-inch model that has a display issue; the backlight isn’t functioning. To check for any image output, I purchased an HDMI adapter for Firewire. Given that the image output remained blank—meaning the monitor wouldn’t activate—I decided to test it on my larger 27-inch iMac from 2011. In hindsight, that was a mistake.

After turning off the 27-inch iMac, I found that restarting it required multiple plug-ins and plug-outs of the HDMI adapter before the system recognized the internal screen again. The internal display remains black, and it only activates after several attempts of manipulating the HDMI adapter. This situation is quite frustrating. For context, here’s what I’m working with:
– Mac Model: 2011 12.2
– Processor: i7 2600
– RAM: 32GB
– Graphics: 6970 1GB
– Storage: 2x 512GB SATA
– Operating System: macOS Ventura (via OpenCore)

I apologize if I posted in the wrong thread.

The 27-inch iMac used to start normally with its internal display. However, since my trial with the HDMI adapter, it only activates after this cumbersome process. Thank you for any help or guidance you can provide! Your assistance is greatly appreciated.

I’ve come across multiple discussions where individuals have shared their frustrating experiences with screen freezes, unexpected shutdowns, and random logouts or restarts. I find myself in a similar situation, grappling with these issues.

Interestingly, I’ve noted that some users on the forums have claimed that switching from the W5700X graphics card to alternatives like the entry-level 580X or upgrading to the Pro Vega II has eliminated these problems for them. This observation made me wonder if there’s a potential link between these glitches and the W5700X graphics card.

Before reaching out to Apple Support once again, I’m keen to gather more information. I’ve seen numerous reports from users expressing similar concerns regarding the W5700X, but I am curious about the experiences of those who use different graphics cards.

Are there others out there who have faced similar issues with graphics cards other than the W5700X? Understanding this could help establish whether the card is indeed the root of the problem or if these issues are more widespread among various graphics cards.

By gathering this information, I hope to make an informed decision about contacting Apple Support again and addressing these persistent issues effectively.

It appears that since the introduction of the M4 chip, coil whine has become a common issue when under load. This development is particularly disappointing, as it suggests a design flaw in the chip itself. For many users, this represents a significant step back from the previously silent performance of the MacBook, especially the Air models that were known for their quiet operation since the M1 chip.

The coil whine is prevalent across all M4 variants, with the Pro and Max versions producing a slightly less high-pitched sound compared to the standard M4 found in the Air and base Pro models. Even after testing multiple replacement units, I have found that the noise issue persists. It seems clear that those who deny experiencing this coil whine may simply be unable to hear the specific frequency, possibly due to aging or degraded hearing.

A straightforward way to verify this phenomenon is by temporarily maximizing the CPU usage through a command in the terminal. Users can observe the coil whine not only in a controlled stress test but also during regular activities where the CPU and SSD are under load. While it is frustrating for users who have come to expect a quiet computing experience with their MacBooks, hopefully, Apple will address this issue in the upcoming M5 chip.

The expectation for silence has been a hallmark of the MacBook experience, and it is essential for the brand to maintain this standard to meet user expectations.

It appears that the link you tried to access is not valid. There may be several reasons for this, including potential misspellings or extra characters added at the end of the URL. If you are the content publisher, it’s worth noting that the most common issues with links arise from typographical errors in parameter names.

It’s advisable to double-check the link for accuracy. If everything looks correct on your end but the link still does not work, you might want to try a couple of troubleshooting methods. Clearing your browser’s cache or using a different web browser or device can often resolve the issue.

Before giving up, take a moment to test the link again after trying these solutions. If the problem persists even after all these checks, we recommend reaching out for assistance. You can contact our support team directly via email for further help with the broken link.

It’s important to ensure that your links function correctly to provide a seamless experience for your audience. Thank you for your understanding, and we hope you find a solution soon.

Understanding version numbers is crucial for navigating Qi specifications, which follow a three-digit numbering format: X.Y.Z. For instance, version 1.0.3 conveys specific information about the release.

The most current version of the Qi specification is 2.2.1, although it is exclusively available to members of the Wireless Power Consortium (WPC). For the general public, the downloadable version is 2.1.

This structure ensures that members have access to the latest industry standards while still encouraging public engagement through earlier versions. By joining the WPC, individuals and organizations can play a significant role in developing and enhancing wireless power standards.

Membership offers invaluable advantages, such as insights that enhance competitive edge, allowing members to effectively lead the way in the introduction of innovative wireless power transfer products. Engaging with the WPC provides a unique opportunity to influence the future of wireless technology.

To verify whether a product meets Qi certification standards, you can search our database. This ensures that consumers and manufacturers can be confident in the quality and compatibility of their wireless power products.