Category: News

Like many others, I eagerly anticipated the release of the iPhone SE4, hoping for a device that would suit my needs. Instead, Apple introduced the $600 iPhone 16e, which left me feeling disappointed. I wish they had retained the SE name for this new model, or better yet, created a dedicated SE line that focuses on the preferences of users like me, particularly regarding price and size.

In the meantime, I continue to use my first-generation iPhone SE. Although it only has 32GB of storage, I manage to make it work with the help of iCloud. Unfortunately, the software has capped out at iOS 15.8.

This raises the question: how much longer can I rely on this phone for my daily needs with such outdated software? I have considered updating my browser to Firefox or other alternatives, but I still cherish the features that my old phone offers. The home button, headphone jack, and compact size are elements I truly appreciate and find difficult to replace.

While newer models may boast impressive features, they don’t cater to my specific preferences, which makes it harder to upgrade. As I cling to my first-generation SE, I find myself wondering if Apple will ever return to the roots of what made the SE line appealing in the first place. A phone that balances functionality, simplicity, and affordability could surely find a loyal audience among those who value these aspects.

For now, I’ll hold on to my trusty device and hope for a better option in the future.

Dejo inquired about the presence of a Podcasts link on the Music Store homepage. They affirmed that the update is legitimate, sharing that they successfully downloaded and installed it via Finder’s Software Update feature.

Their version of iTunes now shows as “iTunes v4.9 (17),” which includes a Podcasts section. Treblah expressed anticipation for the content, questioning why there are currently no podcasts available.

They voiced hope that NPR might be the rumored provider, specifically mentioning their desire to see “All Things Considered” included. SpaceMagic shared their own experience of downloading the update.

They noted that both MacRumors and MacBytes seemed inactive, wondering if this was due to a holiday in the U.S. Notably, they found that version 4.9 of iTunes was smaller than previous updates, only weighing in at 9.9MB.

Applespider lamented about missing the update, having been awake early in the morning when it wasn’t available. They expressed frustration at having to wait until later that evening to access the new features at home.

Ahe contributed their experience, mentioning their unsuccessful attempts to drag and drop a couple of podcast URLs into iTunes, which resulted in an error stating that the URLs were not valid podcast links. The collective sentiments reflect excitement and anticipation for the new features while also highlighting some frustrations experienced by users during the transition.

I have updated my Basic language, transforming it into a 64-bit application. This enhancement allows it to be compatible with macOS Catalina and later versions, which no longer support 32-bit applications. I would appreciate it if you could test the new application. It has the capability to generate standalone applications and includes an integrated help feature for users.

The application can be downloaded from the provided link. This update not only ensures that users on macOS Catalina and newer can utilize the application, but it also offers an improved user experience. With the ability to create independent applications, users can develop and manage their projects more conveniently. Additionally, the integrated help feature will provide immediate support, making it easier for users to navigate through the application and obtain assistance whenever needed.

Please share your feedback after testing the application. Your input will be invaluable in further refining the tool and ensuring it meets user needs effectively. Thank you for taking the time to evaluate the updated Basic language application. I look forward to hearing your thoughts!

A discussion has arisen regarding the security issues related to OpenCore Legacy Patcher (OCLP). Some users point out that despite the Wi-Fi framework being extracted from Ventura, which continues to receive updates from Apple, this process is not immediate. There is often a delay while OCLP developers extract the framework and release updates.

This reliance on Apple’s ongoing support for Ventura raises concerns about potential vulnerabilities. When vulnerabilities are eventually found, it can be unreasonable to expect the developers, who volunteer their time, to communicate and address these issues promptly. The process of identifying a bug, fixing it, and then applying the OCLP update can leave users’ devices exposed to threats during that time.

While it’s important for developers to take breaks and rest, users often find themselves anxiously awaiting critical security patches. Trust is central to this discussion. Users choose to trust Apple Inc., a large, established company, while OCLP’s code can be reviewed, offering a different framework for trust.

Users are placing their confidence in volunteers from the OCLP community to handle sensitive changes to their systems, and this trust can be complicated. Developers of OCLP have admitted that it began as a “small project,” which has grown substantially. However, the complexity of accommodating all Intel Mac users may surpass their initial intentions.

Critics argue that OCLP’s security measures may feel inadequate, and that many users might not fully understand the implications of running potentially vulnerable software. Calls have been made for OCLP to be more transparent about security limitations and for users to consider how they assess trust when using software. It’s essential for users to be informed about potential vulnerabilities and for developers to initiate responsible communication to foster trust within the community.

I previously raised this question in another thread but feel it’s worth sharing here as well. I have a lot of appreciation for Mariner Software’s applications, particularly Paperless, which is one of my go-to Mac apps thanks to its seamless integration with my Fujitsu ScanSnap scanner. Their portfolio also includes other notable apps like MacGourmet Deluxe, Persona, and Contour.

However, it appears that the company may have ceased operations. Their website is currently offline, their emails are bouncing back, and there hasn’t been any new updates or social media posts for a significant time. Although their apps are still available for purchase on the App Store, there are no apparent official communications about the status of the company.

To summarize the situation:

– Marinersoft.com is down and inaccessible. – Their email addresses are not functioning; messages bounce back. – Their Twitter/X account hasn’t had any updates since July 17, 2020, with the last reply on October 12, 2020.

– Despite these issues, their apps remain available for sale on the App Store. Given this lack of communication and apparent inactivity, I’m concerned about the future of their products. If anyone has any insights or background information regarding Mariner Software, I would greatly appreciate it.

Should I start exploring alternative supported software options now? Thank you!

I have been backing up data using 4TB Seagate HDDs, initially at my workplace. To perform these backups, I utilized an OWC USB-C dual drive dock, formatting the drives to macOS Extended Journaled with a GUID partition scheme.

When I decided to continue the backups at home, I inadvertently left the power cable for the OWC dock at work. In light of this, I opted to use a USB-C drive dock that I already owned at home.

However, when I placed a drive into this dock, it failed to read the drive, which caught me off guard. Instead of delving deeper into the issue, I reformatted the drive and restarted the backup process from scratch.

Since then, I have completed the remaining backups using the home dock without any further issues. Eventually, I retrieved the power cable for the OWC dock and attempted to connect one of the drives again.

Unfortunately, I encountered the same problem I faced with the home dock: the OWC dock also did not read the drive. This has prompted me to seek assistance, as I am now left wondering if others have experienced similar issues.

I’m looking for suggestions or solutions to ensure that the drives can be read in both docks. Are there specific settings I should check or configurations that need to be adjusted to facilitate compatibility across different docks?

Any advice from those who have faced this dilemma would be greatly appreciated.

I recently started using Stage Manager on my M1 Air as a way to maximize my screen space. It’s an interesting alternative to the traditional dock, but I’ve noticed a limitation I’d like to address.

At present, Stage Manager only displays four applications at a time. While this setup is useful, it seems to overlook the fact that I often have more applications running concurrently.

This limitation can be a bit frustrating, especially when I need to switch between multiple tasks quickly. I’m curious if there is a way to configure Stage Manager to show all open windows at once.

It would be much more efficient to have a complete overview of my applications without the need to cycle through them or lose track of what I have running. I appreciate any insights or tips you may have on this.

Thank you!

Hello everyone,

I’ve been looking into upgrading the CPUs in a flashed 4,1 dual CPU model and observed that many tutorials emphasize the use of de-lidded processors. This raises a question for me: Is it necessary to purchase de-lidded models, or can I simply use regular Xeons? When comparing the costs, I found that de-lidded X5680 Xeons are nearly $100 for a pair. In contrast, the lidded versions are much more affordable at around $40 for two.

Given the significant price difference, it’s worth considering whether the de-lidding process is essential for the upgrade’s success. I’ve seen various guides suggesting that de-lidded CPUs might offer better thermal performance, which could lead to improved stability and longevity. However, I’m curious if the regular lidded Xeons can still perform adequately for the intended use cases. If anyone has experience or insights on this topic, I would greatly appreciate your thoughts.

Are the benefits of de-lidded CPUs justifiable compared to the cost savings of lidded ones? Thank you for your help!

I’d love to hear your recommendations for docks, stands, and other accessories designed for the Mac Mini 4 and Mac Mini M4 Pro. It would be fascinating to see how brands like Satechi and Hagibis leverage the Mac Mini’s design for docking solutions, especially since the device has unique cooling requirements due to its fan placement. One idea is to create a dock that features a recess for easy access to the power button.

More innovative designs could integrate a mechanism to activate the power button from the dock’s back. It’s essential to avoid placing any dock beneath the Mini, as this would hinder access to the power button and could complicate the device’s functionality. Currently, my Mac Mini is mounted to a dual monitor stand via a VESA bracket, and I’m keen on finding a new, more compact bracket for the M4 Mini, or perhaps a mount that can be positioned under my desk.

A horizontal docking station that holds the Mini upside down could improve airflow and facilitate access to the power button. On a lighter note, it’s hard to believe some of the more absurd designs that have been suggested. A joke may have been missed somewhere along the line in discussions about them.

I’m open to a minimalist dock, about the same size as the new Mac Mini, to sit alongside it. This could feature built-in storage, card readers, and a couple of USB A ports. Positioning the Mini on its side could solve cooling issues while making cable management simpler, although accessing front ports could be a bit tricky if you frequently plug and unplug devices.

If you have access to another Mac, it would be worth attempting to enter DFU mode on the Mac Pro. If it does not enter DFU mode, your only option may be to enlist the help of an Apple technician.

In some cases, Macs equipped with Apple silicon or the Apple T2 Security Chip may become unresponsive and require firmware recovery or restoration from another Mac. It seems that the Mac needs to exhibit some signs of power to successfully enter DFU mode.

Alternatively, you could try resetting the NVRAM, PRAM, and SMC. A situation like this can often resemble issues with a power supply, such as a blown fuse or tripped circuit breaker.

Unfortunately, I can’t afford to spend money on an hourly technician for unguaranteed results, especially considering the service charges that Apple typically imposes. I regret putting the W5700X on my credit card, but here we are.

I have generally had positive experiences purchasing items on eBay, but I never anticipated that even a non-functional card could cause my entire computer to fail. I contacted the seller, who indicated that he is not familiar with Macs; however, he offered a refund if we cannot resolve the issue, which still leaves me with a non-operational computer.

I genuinely appreciate your willingness to assist me. With the wealth of knowledge among the Mac community, I was hoping to connect with someone experienced in hardware repairs, particularly regarding power supplies for this model.

I’ve found power supplies priced between $99 and $150. If there is no fuse or breaker to reset, and if I could confirm that a replacement power supply has been tested and works, I might take the risk and purchase it.

Thank you once again for your help!