Category: News

It seems that the link you tried to access is not valid. The URL you followed may be either incorrect or contain a typo. If you are the publisher of the link, be aware that most issues arise from simple errors, such as misspelled parameter names or inadvertently adding extra characters to the end of the URL.

Before concluding that the link is broken, ensure that it has been entered accurately. If your link appears to be correct but is still not functioning, consider trying a few troubleshooting steps. First, clear your browser’s cache, as this can sometimes resolve loading issues.

Additionally, using a different browser or a separate device may help determine if the problem is specific to your current setup. After performing these checks, give the link another try. If it still does not work and you continue to encounter issues, feel free to reach out for assistance.

You can contact our support team for help with the link. Please provide details about the issue you are experiencing to help us assist you more effectively. In the meantime, we apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused and appreciate your patience as we work to resolve any link-related issues.

General Motors (GM) made headlines last year with its decision to discontinue support for Apple CarPlay and Android Auto in its new electric vehicles, opting instead for its proprietary software platform, Ultifi. This choice has sparked significant controversy, as many consumers view CarPlay as an essential feature.

In fact, a survey conducted by Apple revealed that 79% of U.S. car buyers preferred vehicles compatible with CarPlay. The launch of Ultifi has not gone smoothly for GM; early users of the Chevrolet Blazer EV encountered various technical difficulties with the platform.

Although some issues have since been addressed, the automaker’s ability to develop software is being questioned, especially in comparison to technology giants like Apple. GM has stated that its software strategy aims to enhance integration within its overall vehicle ecosystem, signifying a desire to have more control over the in-car experience.

This approach, while potentially beneficial, carries risks. In a recent interview, GM’s senior vice president of software, Baris Cetinok, who previously worked at Apple, justified the phase-out of CarPlay.

He argued that GM’s commitment to creating a cohesive in-vehicle experience would lead to improved customer satisfaction. Cetinok emphasized that by managing everything from vehicle construction to infotainment, GM could deliver a more seamless experience.

Cetinok elaborated on this vision, highlighting the challenges of switching between different user interfaces like CarPlay while performing complex tasks such as towing. He believes that a unified system can facilitate easier interactions and integration with advanced driving features, ultimately enabling a more efficient user experience.

Overall, GM’s shift away from established platforms poses both opportunities and challenges as it seeks to redefine the in-car technology landscape.

Porsche’s chief designer, Michael Mauer, has confirmed the luxury automaker’s commitment to integrating CarPlay Ultra in upcoming vehicle models. However, he did not provide a specific timeframe for when this feature will be available or additional details.

Porsche was initially included in Apple’s list of manufacturers eager to support the next generation of CarPlay, known as CarPlay Ultra, when it was announced in June 2022. The brand teased what CarPlay Ultra would look like in its vehicles in December 2023 but had not updated the public on its plans until now.

Presently, CarPlay Ultra is available exclusively in luxury Aston Martin vehicles within the U.S. and Canada. Apple has indicated that many other manufacturers, including Hyundai, Kia, and Genesis, are also working on providing this advanced software in their vehicles in the near future.

Launched recently, CarPlay Ultra features deep integration with a vehicle’s instrument cluster and systems, offering built-in radio and climate apps, widgets, and customizable interfaces tailored to each vehicle’s model and brand aesthetics. This system allows drivers to access their iPhone’s app-related data alongside important driving information, such as current speed and tire pressure.

While many manufacturers are embracing CarPlay Ultra, some have announced they will not adopt it, including Mercedes-Benz, Audi, BMW, and Volvo. Interestingly, a recent statement from Polestar suggested enthusiasm for CarPlay Ultra, though conflicting reports imply they may not have plans to implement it after all.

As Apple continues to roll out new technology, the future of CarPlay Ultra hangs in the balance, especially with various industry players weighing their options.

The iPhone 16 Pro and iPhone 16 Pro Max feature a new capability in the Voice Memos app that allows users to add a second audio layer to an existing recording. This feature is perfect for those looking to include vocals, narration, or extra instrumentals without the hassle of using headphones.

With the advanced A18 Pro chip, these iPhone models can play an original Voice Memo through their speakers while simultaneously isolating and capturing new audio. This innovation provides musicians, podcasters, or anyone who frequently records voice notes with the ability to layer sounds, enhancing their recordings effortlessly.

After recording, users can edit and fine-tune layered recordings directly on their device, or transfer them to professional software like Logic Pro for more advanced mixing. To create a layered recording, start by opening the Voice Memos app located in the Utilities folder.

Select the existing recording you wish to augment, and tap the waveform icon to access the audio. From there, pressing the plus icon allows you to prepare for recording a new layer.

When you’re ready, simply tap the red record button to capture the additional audio. After recording, you’ll notice the new layered recording in your Voice Memos list, marked with an overlapping tiles symbol.

You can mix these layers easily by adjusting the Layer Mix slider found in the settings, enabling you to balance the sound effectively. For editing flexibility, you can separate the layers by using the More button and selecting “Separate Layers.” This generates two distinct recordings, which can then be altered or played independently.

It’s important to note that while the layering feature is exclusive to the iPhone 16 Pro models, playback is available on any device running compatible software. Layered recordings are saved in the QuickTime Audio format, and on older devices, separating the layers converts them to accessible .m4a files.

However, only the original layer can be transcribed or recorded in stereo, as additional layers are captured in mono.

MacRumors.com is not experiencing any issues. However, I have encountered some problems in the past when clicking on the forum link from their main page.

Currently, I notice that occasionally a page will load correctly. For instance, I just posted in the game forum, but when I went back to select another forum, I encountered the same formatting issue again.

The page was devoid of any proper layout, which made it challenging to navigate. In an attempt to resolve this, I duplicated the tab that was currently open.

This action led me to a properly formatted page of the gaming forum. From there, I could select different forums without running into the formatting problem.

However, I have observed that sometimes, when the bad format does occur, the page takes an unusually long time to load. At other times, it simply fails to load altogether.

It’s quite inconsistent; on some occasions, the page opens up with no formatting at all, which can be frustrating. It seems that the issue fluctuates and can happen randomly, creating a less than ideal user experience.

Overall, while MacRumors.com itself is functioning well, my interactions with the forum links have highlighted a few technical glitches that I hope get resolved soon.

I couldn’t find any existing discussions on this topic, so I decided to share my recent discovery. Today, I visited the LCBO and came across some intriguing beer that caught my eye. I was so drawn to it that I felt it was an absolute must to purchase. The selection was diverse and unique, making it difficult to resist.

There were several varieties that piqued my curiosity, prompting me to explore flavors beyond my usual preferences. The marketing and packaging of the products were particularly engaging, leading me to imagine how they would taste. To document the experience, I recorded a video unboxing to showcase the beer I bought. I thought it might be fun for others to see what I found and to share my initial impressions.

I believe that trying different beers can be a delightful adventure, and I’m excited to dive into these new options. As someone who appreciates unique flavors and craft brews, I’m always on the lookout for something special that stands out from the mainstream offerings. As I share this with you, I encourage fellow beer enthusiasts to venture into local stores, seek out those unusual finds, and not hesitate to experiment with different tastes. Who knows what surprises might await you?

Stay tuned for my video unboxing, where I’ll reveal the beers I chose and provide my thoughts on them.

I am in the process of replacing my iMac 27-inch 2019 model with a Mac Studio, as Apple has designated it as end of life. At the moment, I have a configuration in mind, but I have a question that I hope someone can assist with.

I don’t necessarily require 1TB of storage, which adds unnecessary cost to my purchase. Historically, I have always opted for 512GB, but I’ve come across numerous discussions on YouTube suggesting that choosing the 512GB model might lead to a significant decrease in data transfer speeds compared to the 1TB version.

I am reaching out to see if anyone has BlackMagic benchmark tests for the 512GB model they could share with me. It would also be helpful if someone could either confirm or refute the claims regarding performance differences.

Your insights would greatly assist in my decision-making process as I look to upgrade my system. Thank you in advance for any information you can provide!

The controller chipset in question, the ASM1153E, is designed to support UASP (USB Attached SCSI Protocol). This indicates that, in theory, it should function as expected.

However, to ensure compatibility and reliability, you will need to install the SAT SMART driver, which can be found in a previous post linked by Binary Fruit. It is also important to note the evolving landscape of driver management in macOS.

Third-party developers have historically relied on KPIs (Key Performance Indicators) for drivers and various functionalities within kernel extensions. However, there is a significant shift taking place as these kernel extensions are progressively being replaced by System Extensions.

This shift represents a significant change in how operating systems are designed to handle these functionalities. As for the future, there are uncertainties regarding the longevity of the current solutions in upcoming macOS versions, such as macOS 26, known as Tahoe.

It is unclear whether the existing setup will remain effective or if an updated alternative, specifically a system extension, will be provided to replace the kernel extension versions that are being phased out. This means that users should remain vigilant for updates and consider potential long-term implications for their current setups, particularly as the operating system evolves.

I rarely inspect my Apple Watch for signs of damage or wear unless I’ve really given it a hard knock. To me, it’s just a tool, and tools naturally accumulate wear over time. There’s no way to completely prevent this; even the best cases don’t guard against scratches caused by tiny bits of grit, and screen protectors can’t stop all damage. While it’s possible to reduce some minor issues, one must consider the trade-offs.

Using a case can make your Apple Watch look like cheap plastic, while a screen protector might slightly hinder touch responsiveness and brightness. I own a luxury Omega watch worth several times more than an Apple Watch Ultra, and it has neither a screen protector nor a case. It showcases a few scratches and marks, but those imperfections represent the beauty of wabi-sabi—the acceptance of transience and imperfection. I know people with watches valued well into six figures.

Regardless of how often they wear them—be it daily or on special occasions—they wouldn’t dream of covering their timepieces with cases or protectors. This speaks to a shared appreciation for the marks that come with time and use. If you’re looking for a different perspective, I recommend exploring articles on the concept of wabi-sabi. It highlights the beauty in age and wear.

My Omega is nearly 20 years old and still functions perfectly, with the potential to do so for another couple of decades if maintained properly. In contrast, I suspect my Apple Watch Ultra 2 will become e-waste in just five years, maybe ten at best.

When I tap on a notification, it now slides over and displays an “Open” button instead of directly opening the app. I’m curious if anyone else has experienced this.

Did I accidentally change a setting that triggered this change? It’s becoming quite an annoyance, and I would appreciate any guidance on how to revert it to the previous behavior.

If anyone has information or suggestions on how to fix this, I would be grateful. I just want my notifications to function as they did before.